The Clintons and the Kahns

Most everyone who keeps up with politics is very much aware of the political trick which the DNC (Hillary) pulled on Trump at their convention when they introduced the Kahns to talk about the loss of their son in a military attack while in service our country.

While no one can help but feel the pain of any parents who loses  a son or daughter to war it is sad when those very parents use their child's death for political purposes.
When Mr. Kahn turned his  full attack on Donald Trump because he (Trump) believes we should not continue to accept immigrants from an Isis area where they cannot be background checked it could pretty well be expected that Trump would fight back and Hillary's media was waiting with their charges that he was attacking a poor grieving family.

Well it would seem that the relationship between Mr Kahn and the Clintons runs deep. Also his connections  with Saudi Arabia, who The Clintons have received millions of dollars from, is well documented.
I found an article this morning relating to the subject and then there is an email which I received this morning. I hope you will follow up on this. There is a serious attack being waged against Donald Trump both by Hillary Clinton and her minions and the majority of the media.
In case you don't believe the media is totally for Hillary, did you know that 90% of journalist donate to the democrat party and are admitted liberals.
 Here is the link: http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/08/01/clinton-cash-khizr-khans-deep-legal-financial-connections-saudi-arabia-hillarys-clinton-foundation-connect-terror-immigration-email-scandals/

And the email:

"Does this surprise anyone??????

Just thought everyone should know...because our news media will NEVER tell you.

A friend did research on the Muslim father (that Trump spoke of in a negative light), Mr Kahn, and here's what was found...

"The law firm for which Kahn worked just COINCIDENTALLY (yeah, right) is also the law firm for the Royal Court of Saudi Arabia, the tax lawyers for Bill & Hillary Clinton (and the Clinton Foundation) and also where Loretta Lynch worked. Oh yeah, they also represent a small tech firm in Denver, CO. (yes, the same little firm that "managed" Hillary's private server)"

The COLLUSION AND CORRUPTION RUNS DEEPER THAN IMAGINABLE my friends!!! ...no wonder the media is falling all over itself to defend this man."

I hope you will read and share.

Thanks you

 

MUSLIMS IN THE WHITEHOUSE...HOW MANY ARE THERE?

#WAKE UP AMERICA

QUESTION?  Are you aware of how many Muslims are in the Obama administration? Have you ever just gone to Google and searched for that information. If you have not I think you will be shocked.

QUESTION? Why would Obama have surrounded himself with Muslims and why has he put them in decision making positions in his Administration ?

QUESTION? Why does Obama have, and has had since before he became president,  a Muslim woman, Valarie Jarrett, born in Iran as his most important advisor?

Don't believe this because I say it is so, do your own research. It is inconceivable to me that so many people, after almost 8 years of Obama still don't know who he is and what he represents. The information about him has been out there on the internet since before his first election yet people rushed to embrace him because of the color of his skin, the thing we are not suppose to judge people by. Yet he is president precisely because of his skin color without ever checking on who the man is and what the content of his character is.

If you have not paid enough attention, over the past years, to know what is happening to our country at his hands please wake up before it is too late. You children's and grandchildren's future depends on it.

Don't Buy the Lie... Hillary and Benghazi

Anyone who believes the current left wing media's proclamations regarding the exoneration of Hillary Clinton for her role in Benghazi,  in the report released this past week, has to be intentionally ignorant.

Have you read the report, or even the summary report by Congressmen Jordan and Pompeo. They are quite easy to find online. The actual report is over 800 pages but the Jordan Pompeo report is an easy read of just over 50 pages.

Have you seen the movie 13 Hours or have you read the book (same name). Have you watched the interview with three of the men who survived the Bengazi fire fight by Brett Baier on Fox News? Have you seen any of the many interviews with  these men who fought for those many hours when our government did not even try to rescue them?

Did you watch any of the hearings in Washington regarding Bengazi?

The information is easily available. Information which contradicts everything the left and Hillary say about the death of Ambassador Stevens and the three men who also died. One at the consulate where he was trying to protect Ambassador Stevens and   two more who died on a rooftop fighting off the attackers at the annex building about a mile away from the original attack.

There are hours of testimony regarding what happened and thousands of pages of recorded emails and correspondence.

If you watch Fox News you know most of it, if you don't you probably know very little because the media has worked overtime for the past four years to cover everything up in order first to protect Obama who was just a few weeks from election to his second term in office and to protect HIllary for her 2016 run for the Presidency. Yes she was preparing for her second run for the office even as Obama was running for his second term. I believe she started her run the minute she accepted the job of secretary of state for Obama when he was first elected. We may never know what the inside arrangements were between Obama and Hillary but be sure there was some sort of deal between them.

The Hillary  team keeps telling us  us how qualified Hillary is to be president yet when one of her supporters is asked to name just one accomplishment to support their contention...silence.

Living at taxpayers expense for most of a persons life does not equal  experience to be president and so Hillary needed a big accomplishment for her run for the presidency in 2016. I have no idea how she settled on Libya but she did and against the advise of many advisors in the military side of the administration she decided that Qaddafi needed to be removed, even though he wasn't a threat to us. So with support from Nato the deed was done.

Here is a little bit of info I found on a website called informationclearinghouse.info:
" And the military in the United States, the United States Africa Command was originally opposed to going into Libya. But the pressures of Goldman Sachs, along with those people called the humanitarian hawks—Samantha Powers, Susan Rice, and Hillary Clinton—[incompr.] the American public and the media to go along with France and Britain for the destruction of Libya in 2011. And the people of Africa are still living with this destruction, where over 50,000 people in Africa have been killed, 40,000 people, black-skinned from Tawergha, have been thrown out of where they live. And so we have to see that initially the United States military was opposed, but later on, the media, along with Clinton, Rice, and Powers, were able to build up the psychological warfare and propaganda within this society against the United States people to portray Gaddafi as this terrible leader, when, as you said, he was in league with the Western banking and financial institutions."

Like most things done by the left they never have a plan for completion of their ideas and this was no exception. After the overthrow, and since, Libya has been in complete turmoil. Since this was to be Hillary's big deal, her proof of accomplishment that she would run on in the 2016 election campaign it was imperative that the general public think of Libya as a success.  The media, always complicit in HIllary's schemes and transgressions, were not about to give her away and Obama continued his lies to the American public about his successes. 

And so Hillary appointed Ambassador Stevens to Libya with grand  plans  to show the world her success. Unfortunately Libya was not cooperating. In Benghazi the two years prior to the attack on the consulate was not a place of success. There were numerous attacks and threats on both our consulate as well as on the British posts and the Red Cross. Our people, stationed in Benghazi, sent a endless stream of requests to Hillary's State Dept requesting additional security. None were ever granted. The consulate building itself did not meet the minimum standards set by the State Department for Embassies but excuses were made that it was a consulate and temporary so therefore Hillary's office did nothing. 

The report does not "clear" Hillary but it does not go far enough in placing blame.  While she did not plan for the attack to happen, she did nothing to prevent it. She did nothing to try to rescue the people in Benghazi, in fact while she held a meeting within hours of the start of the attack 5 of 11 items on their agenda was about how they would spin the information to the public and indeed just a few hours later she sent emails to her daughter as well as to leaders in Libya and Egypt that the attack had been  pre-planned by terrorists at the same time she went on TV and told the rest of us that it was because of a video. She told the families of the slain men, as she stood by the coffins that it was because of the video and indeed for days Hillary and Obama went before the public with their lies.

The reason for the lies was obvious. This was September 11, the election was almost upon us.  Obama's whole campaign was about how well he was doing with the wars. The public must not be told that Libya was in a shambles and if Obama and Hillary admitted that the attack in Benghazi was a planned attack by terrorist it would paint a completely different picture of Obama's success in his first term.   Hillary's campaign in 2016 was to be about her wonderful success in Libya and she could not accept the blame that her big plan not only had not worked out the way she expected. It had cost the lives of four men, one of them an Ambassador she had sent to Benghazi. Because of her poor judgement and failure  to send the reinforcements they had asked for hundreds of times her grand accomplishment was a failure.


 

How has this been allowed to happen

The following was sent to me and I felt it should be shared . Hope you will forward it on.

It’s NOT HER MONEY! Just think, Mary Lincoln was taken to task for purchasing china for the White House during the Civil War. And Mamie Eisenhower had to shell out the salary for her personal secretary from her husband's salary. Total Personal Staff members for other first ladies paid by taxpayers ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mamie Eisenhower:--- One-- paid for personally out of President's salary. Total number of Personal Staff Members paid by Tax Payers. Jackie Kennedy: -------One Lady Bird Johnson___One Pat Nixon ---------------One Betty Ford---------------One Rosaline Carter: ------ One Barbara Bush: ---------One Hilary Clinton: -------- Seven Laura Bush: ----------- One Michele Obama: ----- Twenty-two How things have changed! If you're one of the tens of millions of Americans facing certain destitution, earning less than subsistence wages stocking the shelves at Wal-Mart or serving up McDonald cheeseburgers, prepare to scream and then come to realize that the benefit package for these servants of MS Michelle are the same as members of the national security and defense departments and the bill for these assorted lackeys is paid by YOU, John Q. Public: Note: Look out for Hillery if she gets elected Michele Obama's personal staff: One.. $192,200 - Sher, Susan (Chief Of Staff) Two.. $160,000 - Frye, Jocelyn C. (Director of Policy And Projects For The First Lady) Three.. $133,000 - Rogers, Desiree G. (White House Social Secretary for Mrs. Obama) Four.. $122,000 - Johnston, Camille Y. (Director of Communications for the First Lady) Five.. $120,000 - Winter, Melissa (Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady) Six.. $110,000 Medina , David S. (Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady) Seven.. $104,000 - Lilyveld, Catherine M. (Director and Press Secretary to the First Lady) Eight.. $95,000 - Starkey, Frances M. (Director of Scheduling and Advance for the First Lady) Nine.. $90,000 - Sanders, Trooper (Deputy Director of Policy and Project for the First Lady) Ten.. $85,000 - Burnough, Erinn (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary) Eleven.. $84,000 - Reinstein, Joseph B.(Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary) Twelve.. $82,000 - Goodman, Jennifer R. (Deputy Director of Scheduling and Events Coordinator For The First Lady) Thirteen.. $80,000 Fitz, Alan O.(Deputy Director of Advance and Trip Director for the First Lady) Fourteen.. $77,500 - Lewis, Dana M. (Special Assistant and Personal Aide to the First Lady) Fifteen.. $72,500 - Mustaphi, Semonti M. (Associate Director and Deputy Press Secretary To The First Lady) Sixteen.. $70,000 - Jarvis, Kristen E. (Special Assistant for Scheduling and Traveling Aide To The First Lady) Seventeen.. $65,000 - Lechtenberg, Tyler A. (Associate Director of Correspondence For The First Lady) Eighteen.. $63,000 - Tubman, Samantha a (Deputy Associate Director, Social Office) Nineteen.. $60,000 - Boswell, Joseph J. (Executive Assistant to the Chief Of Staff to the First Lady) Twenty.. $56,000 - Armbruster, Sally M. (Staff Assistant to the Social Secretary) Twenty-One.. $55,000 - Bookey, Natalie (Staff Assistant) Twenty-Two.. $55,000 - Jackson, Deilia A. (Deputy Associate Director of Correspondence for the First Lady) Total $2,075,200 in annual salaries - all for someone we did not vote for and apparently have no control over and 5 are Muslim and 13 are African-American There has NEVER been anyone in the White House at any time who has created such an army of staffers whose sole duties are the facilitation of the First Lady's social life. One wonders why she needs so  much help, at taxpayer expense. (I'm wondering why there are no guidelines or restraints for this and other activities concerning our government officials and their kin.) Note: This does not include makeup artist Ingrid Grimes-Miles, 49, and "First Hairstylist" Johnny Wright, 31, both of whom traveled aboard Air Force One on all ALL Trips,Europe included. Michele usually gets dropped off in another City along with her Mother and 2 Daughters Note: As of 11/15.2015 the Obama Family has spent over 1.3 Billion dollars on personal family family trips. They were personal not political or Government related. Copyright 2009 Canada Free Press: Yes, I know, The Canadian Free Press had to publish this, perhaps because America no longer has a free press and the USA media is too scared that they might be considered racist or suffer at the hands of Obama.

What a disgrace! Judy

Holy Hypocrisy and Hot Air by Michelle Malkin

This is so good I really just had to share it with you. Michelle hits the nail on the head. 

Holy Hypocrisy and Hot Air

By Michelle Malkin

June 24, 2015, 6:00 am

Unlike Pope Francis, I believe that air-conditioning and the capitalists responsible for the technology are blessings to the world.
Perhaps the head of the Catholic Church, who condemned “the increasing use and power of air-conditioning” last week in a market-bashing encyclical, is unaware of the pioneering private company that has donated its time, energy and innovative heating, ventilating and air-conditioning equipment to the Vatican’s most famous edifice for more than a decade.
That’s right. While the pontiff sanctimoniously attacks “those who are obsessed with maximizing profits,” Carrier Corporation — a $13 billion for-profit company with 43,000 employees worldwide (now a unit of U.S.-based United Technologies Corp.) — ensures that the air in the Vatican’s Sistine Chapel stays clean and cool.
Last fall, Carrier unveiled a groundbreaking HVAC system for the Vatican to help preserve Michelangelo’s masterpieces against pollution caused by the estimated six million visitors who descend on the Sistine Chapel every year to see its famous frescoes.
As the company described it, their new solution “uses two Carrier AquaForce(r) 30XWV water-cooled chillers with Greenspeed(r) intelligence, each with 580 kilowatts of capacity. It leverages specially designed software and components, as well as patented, energy-saving technologies to maintain optimal climate conditions for the protection of the paintings within the chapel.” State-of-the-art intelligent controls “anticipate visitor levels and adjust its performance intuitively.” It also “delivers twice the efficiency and three times the capacity of the former system, which was built and installed by Carrier in the early 1990s.”
Here’s the lesson about air-conditioning capitalists that Pope Francis fails to appreciate: Carrier’s technological know-how and breakthroughs didn’t just descend from the clouds. As I recount in my latest book, “Who Built That,” every perfectly chilled home, office, movie theater, mall, factory, hospital, lab and museum owes its existence to the profit-seeking pioneers of manufactured weather: Willis Carrier and Irvine Lyle.
These early 20th-century inventive giants brought air-conditioning to the market and to the masses. Willis Carrier was the scientist-tinkerpreneur whose prolific stream of experiments and epiphanies, beginning in 1902, fueled historic technological advances in heating, refrigeration and air-conditioning. Irvine Lyle was the mechanical engineer-turned-salesman who imagined countless new commercial applications for Carrier’s work — and successfully turned those ideas into a multibillion-dollar business through relentless promotion, pitches, networking, advertising and outreach.
The scientists and their core team begged, borrowed and made stock sales to friends and neighbors. Carrier even enlisted his dentist for cash to get Carrier Engineering Corporation up and running in 1915. Carrier, Lyle and five founding engineers together pitched in $32,600 in start-up funds.
The Carrier capitalists risked it all in defiance of an economic depression and amid the tumult of world war. They couldn’t afford their own factory and scrounged for made-to-order parts wherever they could find them. They dug into their own pockets to cover salary shortfalls. The wealth wasn’t handed to them. Carrier and Lyle, farm boys who both graduated from Cornell, drove their men hard and themselves harder.
The Carrier team sold its products to businesses, large and small, that spanned the spectrum of human needs and wants. The pope should know that in addition to sparing countless lives from death by heat wave, Carrier designed a special system for Jonas Salk that helped maintain constant temperatures in the vats where Salk’s poliovirus strains grew. The Salk vaccine saved thousands of lives and spearheaded the vaccine revolution.
From Hollywood to the pharmaceutical industry to textiles to the retail industry to the military to homeowners, there isn’t a sector of the American economy that Carrier and Lyle didn’t help transform. Their zealous focus on helping businesses provide better products at cheaper costs resulted in the invaluable byproducts of increased health, comfort and happiness.
While the pope blames commercial enterprises and the “global market economy” for causing “environmental degradation,” it is a worldwide commercial enterprise made in America that solved the human-caused degradation of, and environmental damage to, the Vatican’s most prized art and assets.
If the pontiff truly believes “excessive consumption” of modern conveniences is causing evil “climate change,” will he be shutting down and returning the multimillion-dollar system Carrier generously gifted to the Vatican Museums?
If not, I suggest, with all due respect, that Pope Francis do humanity a favor and refrain from blowing any more hot air unless he’s willing to stew in his own.

Be Careful What You Wish (VOTE) For

As we move closer to our next, and probably the most important election you will ever vote in, the majority of people haven't a clue as to the candidates. Most will consider themselves Patriotic as they walk into the polling place and give their vote to someone they know nothing about except for a few soundbites for or against.
To my amazement Hillary remains popular even though those who say, with a stupid look of adoration on their faces, I like Hillary but when asked why there is no answer. That is because there is nothing that anyone can mention that shows accomplishment on her part.
Anyone my age who has paid attention should remember all the questionable acts which occurred during the Clinton's time in Arkansas and Washington DC. If you can't list them then do yourself a favor and do your homework. Most people will remember, if nothing else, Bill's "I did not have sex with that woman" lie . He was impeached but not removed from office and Hillary was right behind him covering his ass all the way and running a smear campaign against any woman (and there were quite a few) who dared accuse him.
Now she wants to be president. She doesn't want to talk to to the media and answer any questions, she sure does not want to talk about the millions of dollars she and Bill have raked in for speaking fees and contributions (Clinton Foundation) while she was Secretary of State and while the very people paying the speaking fees and making the contributions were receiving favors from our country through determinations made by Hillary as Secretary of State. Did you know she OK'd the sale of  our National resources  to Russia? The following is from Breitbart.com
" Hillary Clinton’s State Department was part of a panel that approved the sale of one of America’s largest uranium mines at the same time a foundation controlled by the seller’s chairman was making donations to a Clinton family charity, records reviewed by The Wall Street Journal show."
Treason you might ask???? 
There is another, perhaps the biggest problem with Hillary Clinton becoming President. Her name is
Huma Abedin. Huma has been with Hillary for a long time and is reported to be her closest confidant. It was once said that "Hillary wouldn't go out the door without Huma"
So what do you know of Huma, other than the fact that she is married to Weiner...the congressman who sent out pictures of his body to young women.
The following excerpts are taken from an article by Joseph Klein in Frontpage Magazine.
"Huma Abedin is the daughter of Saleha Mahmood Abedin, who has had ties to numerous Islamist organizations including the Muslim Brotherhood.  During her youth, Huma lived with her family in Saudi Arabia, where they had re-located from Michigan and where she was exposed to the Wahhabi jihadist ideology, before returning to the United States at the age of 18."

"The Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs – an Abedin family project in which Huma Abedin was deeply involved – espouses the Islamic supremacist ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood. As Andrew McCarthy noted, Huma Abedin herself “spent 12 years working at a journal intended to aid Islamic domination of the West.”"
Huma has very strong ties with much of the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic groups. If you need to refresh your memory check out the position both Obama and Clinton had regarding Egypt and
 enthusiastically supported the ouster of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and favored the the Muslim Brotherhood’s choice for president, Mohammed Morsi, prevail in the presidential run-off election over his more secular army-backed rival. Morsi is now in prison for crimes against the Egyption  people.
Huma was by Hillary's side when Hillary Hillary Clinton led the charge within the Obama administration for regime change in Libya. She urged action to overthrow the Gadhafi regime in Libya after the start of an “Arab Spring” uprising in that country.This move was controversial because Gadhafi was no threat to us at the time. He had given up his nuclear weapons years earlier.
Thanks to Obama and Clinton we now have the Fox guarding the hen-house in Washington. 
I encourage everyone reading this to please take the time to research this and all that is happening in our country. If citizens don't wake up soon we will soon be a third world country.

Another Child Suicide (or) Has Government Dependency brought us to this.

by donna merritt...
Once more we hear the sad news that another child has taken his own life because he was the subject of cruel treatment at the hands of his peers. This little boy was fourteen years old and lived in Florida.
Can you imagine yourself at that age, unable to make your own decisions, being dependant upon someone else to keep you safe and out of harms way? Can you imagine the people you love the most sending you to school every day knowing full well what you will be subjected to and you are unable to stop it?
If I try to put myself there I find it horrifying.
This isn't about parents who didn't care about their child. According to what I have heard they had moved from New York to Florida to try to make things better for their child. However, they failed to take the one step that could have offered him protection. They failed him by failing to remove him from the situation. They failed him by expecting someone else to care for his safety.  They failed him by failing to understand what government cannot do for him. Government cannot keep him safe.
Government can pass laws but unless they can enforce tthose laws they matter not.
Do you wonder why these parents, and other parents whose children have died because of bullying failed to take the one step that could have removed the threat from their child's life.
One needs not go far back (in years) in our country to find a time when the majority of people were self sufficient. Dealings with the Feds were few and far between and probably most people lived their lives without thinking about the Federal Government except in times of War. They certainly didn't expect interference in their daily lives nor did they expect their fool or housing or education or day to day safety to come from the Federal government.
Schools were local and decision making, regarding the rules and happenings in a school, was a community affair.  Any problem arising from a child's behavior was handled promply with the involvement of the parents of the children involved and the teacher.
So what is the change which has allowed so many children to be so bullied, yet forced to go back day after day into this untendable situation, a situation in which they cannot cope, until they are driven to take their own lives?
The biggest change is that government, through it's welfare state mentality, it's Nany state approach, it's "we know best what is good for you" decision making has convinced too many people that the government is always right, that the government will take care of everything, that you need not be responsible and it's not your fault, someone else is responsible for you problems whatever they may be, just go to the closest government entity and all your problems will be solved.
Too many people no longer feel responsible for or about anything and in the cases of bullying in schools they have put their reliance in the government (ie) school to handle everything.
Problem is...the government can't...
We, as citizens of the greatest country in the world, must once more become responsible. Responsible for ourselves, responsible for our children, for our livlihood, for and to our communities.
To think about a young child tryng to deal with something, far out of his//her control, and being forced, by those very people who should love him best into the situation again and again, day after day. is just too sad for words.